I used to belong to a Facebook group organized around issues
of ministry. The people in the group
shared prayer requests. They told
stories about situations in their congregation and occasionally asked for
guidance with those situations. And they
shared blog posts and news items of interest.
I don’t know how many members the group had when I joined
nearly three years ago but it had grown to somewhere over 7,000 today. A wide range of theological perspectives were
represented, nearly all of which grew somewhere on the Christian tree. And it would be safe to say that if the
various theologies were arranged on a Bell curve that the tradition I am a part
of, and where I place myself within that tradition, would be between 1 and 2
standard deviations from the mean. One
consequence of my understanding of my theological location within the group was
that I learned to pick-and-choose what I posted and what conversations I took
part in. Suffice to say that some
conversations could become either quite heated (in a generally respectful way)
or just generate so many comments that it was impractical, and nearly impossible,
for me to participate in those discussions in a way that was fair to all
involved. So for many threads I would
read the initial post, perhaps follow the discussion, but only infrequently
join in.
All of which is to set the stage for this event. Person A posted a brief video of Person B,
without making comment on the video and just asking for people's thoughts. Myself, Person C, watched the video and
offered a two-part response. Part one
was my own brief understanding of the issue of the video, followed by my belief
of the logical destination of Person B's thoughts would lead. Enter Person D, who instead of engaging my
response, jumped all over me.
So I started to write a response. This particular person and I have disagreed
before and my initial response was to go back to the issue. I'm not trying to be heroic in describing
myself. It was the issue I was more concerned about than the attack. But as I worked on phrasing my response it
occurred to me that I was spending time, perhaps too much time, on something
that really wasn't very important. I
have never studied Shakespeare but the quote
of his, "To thine own self be true",
started playing in my head. At first I
heard it in regard to responding to Person D.
But then I heard it differently, as some other familiar words went through my
head:
"Therefore,
if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold,
the new has come."
Who is the self I should be true to? The self that quickly responds when provoked
by confrontation, be it large or small?
The self that can hardly help but to point out theological error in a
diverse group of fairly highly educated people?
Or perhaps the self who is a new creation in Christ? The self where the old has passed away and
the new has come?
That didn't take much time to figure out.
Christ has claimed me as his own, and he is at work shaping
me, and all who call on him in faith, to be more and more in his image, which
means being less and less like the person I was before faith.
So deleted the response I was writing to Person D, and deleted
myself from the group.
"To thine own self be true?" Yes, but only so far as that self is being
shaped in the image of my Savior and Lord.
Scripture quotations
are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by
Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All
rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment